2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2000 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 Caterham 7. (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 2003 Caterham 7.
Because 2003 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Caterham 7 | 2000 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Caterham | Ford |
| Model | 7 | Windstar |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 3066 mm |
