2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Matra-Simca M72. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Matra-Simca M72 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP) has 110 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 2003 Caterham 7 has manual transmission. 2003 Caterham 7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
Make | Caterham | Matra-Simca |
Model | 7 | M72 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 50 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |