2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2003 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 7 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2490 mm |