2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2004 Renault Scenic

To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2004 Renault Scenic. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 1214 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.

Because 2003 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Caterham 7 (210 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 2003 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Scenic.

Compare all specifications: