2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2003 Caterham 7. (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2003 Caterham 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1335 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (176 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Caterham | Toyota |
Model | 7 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2800 mm |