2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2006 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 2003 Caterham 7 has manual transmission. 2003 Caterham 7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 7 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2490 mm |