2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 160 more horse power than 2003 Caterham 7. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (210 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Caterham | Holden |
Model | 7 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |