2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2009 Nissan Note
To start off, 2009 Nissan Note is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Note weights approximately 552 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Because 2003 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2009 Nissan Note | |
Make | Caterham | Nissan |
Model | 7 | Note |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2600 mm |