2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2003 Caterham 7. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (176 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7. 2010 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 2003 Caterham 7 has manual transmission. 2003 Caterham 7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Caterham | Holden |
Model | 7 | Caprice |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |