2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2010 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 5008.
Because 2003 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Caterham 7 (210 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2003 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 5008.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2010 Peugeot 5008 | |
Make | Caterham | Peugeot |
Model | 7 | 5008 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1835 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2735 mm |