2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 2003 Caterham 7. (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2003 Caterham 7.
Because 2011 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (176 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2011 Audi R8 | |
Make | Caterham | Audi |
Model | 7 | R8 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2649 mm |