2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2011 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2011 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2011 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2011 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Caterham 7 (176 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Caterham 7 | 2011 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Caterham | Proton |
| Model | 7 | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2610 mm |
