2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (210 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Caterham | Citroen |
Model | 7 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 87 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |