2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2012 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (176 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Caterham | Holden |
Model | 7 | Colorado |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 207 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |