2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2012 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2012 Subaru Outback is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Outback (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2003 Caterham 7. (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2003 Caterham 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Outback weights approximately 1108 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Subaru Outback (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (176 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 2012 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7. 2012 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 2003 Caterham 7 has manual transmission. 2003 Caterham 7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: