2003 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1951 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1330 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Astro | 1951 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
Model | Astro | A6G |
Year Released | 2003 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4292 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2320 mm |