2003 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1958 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1958 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1958 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 740 kg more than 1958 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Astro | 1958 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Astro | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4292 cc | 1451 cc |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2540 mm |
