2003 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1960 Ferrari 850
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 850 would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1960 Ferrari 850. (72 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1960 Ferrari 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1960 Ferrari 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Astro | 1960 Ferrari 850 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ferrari |
| Model | Astro | 850 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4292 cc | 847 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 64 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 680 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 140 L |
