2003 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1979 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Astro | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Astro | 66 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4292 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1390 mm |