2003 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2001 Chevrolet Celta
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Celta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Celta would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 275 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Celta.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Astro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Astro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Celta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Astro | 2001 Chevrolet Celta | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | Astro | Celta |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1675 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 71 L |
