2003 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot RCZ.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Astro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Astro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Astro | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Chevrolet | Peugeot |
Model | Astro | RCZ |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4292 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1359 mm |