2003 Chevrolet Avalanche vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,325 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche (282 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Avalanche | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Avalanche | Munga |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5325 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 76.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 74 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 31 L |