2003 Chevrolet Avalanche vs. 1981 Mazda 626
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,325 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche has automatic transmission and 1981 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1981 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Avalanche | 1981 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Avalanche | 626 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5325 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2520 mm |