2003 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219 would be higher. At 2,193 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219 weights approximately 93 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Because 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Cavalier | 219 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2189 cc | 2193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2660 mm |