2003 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1962 Ford Capri
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Capri would be higher. At 2,189 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier (120 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1962 Ford Capri. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Capri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 234 kg more than 1962 Ford Capri. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Capri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Capri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Ford Capri (185 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier. (176 Nm). This means 1962 Ford Capri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1962 Ford Capri | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Cavalier | Capri |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2189 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 185 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 72.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 45 L |