2003 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1971 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Datsun 240Z (151 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 123 kg more than 1971 Datsun 240Z.
Because 1971 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Datsun 240Z (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier. (183 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1971 Datsun 240Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1971 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Chevrolet | Datsun |
Model | Cavalier | 240Z |
Year Released | 2003 | 1971 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2190 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.2 L/100km | 11 L/100km |