2003 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,189 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier (176 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Cavalier | 66 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2189 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |