2003 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 139 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cavalier | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2189 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2680 mm |