2003 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1989 Mazda 323

To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda 323 (140 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 169 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier (176 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (164 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Chevrolet Cavalier 1989 Mazda 323
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Cavalier 323
Year Released 2003 1989
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2190 cc 1840 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 120 HP 140 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 176 Nm 164 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4700 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89.1 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 85 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1215 kg 1046 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4000 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 50 L