2003 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 107 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier | 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cavalier | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1475 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2550 mm |
