2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 1956 Humber Super Snipe
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne has automatic transmission and 1956 Humber Super Snipe has manual transmission. 1956 Humber Super Snipe will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 1956 Humber Super Snipe | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Humber |
| Model | Cheyenne | Super Snipe |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 4138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 5050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1680 mm |
