2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 1960 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 1960 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Cheyenne | Taunus |
Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1460 mm |