2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 1964 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MG |
| Model | Cheyenne | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1350 mm |
