2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 1964 Morris Minor
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morris Minor would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 1964 Morris Minor | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Morris |
| Model | Cheyenne | Minor |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 3770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1530 mm |
