2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 1978 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 1978 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cheyenne | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1340 mm |