2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 1995 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cheyenne | Magna |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1440 mm |
