2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 2000 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 2000 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Cheyenne | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1800 mm |