2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 2002 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 2002 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cheyenne | 6 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 164 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1490 mm |