2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 2005 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2005 MCC ForTwo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne has automatic transmission and 2005 MCC ForTwo has manual transmission. 2005 MCC ForTwo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 2005 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
Model | Cheyenne | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1540 mm |