2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Cheyenne | 6 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
