2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 2009 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 2009 Mercury Mountaineer | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
| Model | Cheyenne | Mountaineer |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 4009 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1860 mm |
