2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Cheyenne | Fluence |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 110 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1478 mm |