2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Cheyenne | S60 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 2097 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1484 mm |
