2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 81 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Talbot |
| Model | Malibu | Baby |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3130 mm |
