2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1960 DAF 600
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DAF 600 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1960 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1960 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 939 kg more than 1960 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DAF 600. (46 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1960 DAF 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Malibu | 600 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 46 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 65 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 28 L |
