2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 1189 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Malibu | R 360 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 60 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 63 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 55 L |
