2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (168 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (257 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | R 360 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 355 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 22 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 63 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 1770 mm |