2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1963 Holden EJ

To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 370 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (299 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications: