2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1964 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1964 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 1964 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1964 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Chevrolet | Plymouth |
Model | Malibu | Valiant |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3501 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |