2003 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1966 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 274 kg more than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Malibu | 1966 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
Model | Malibu | Bellel |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 40 L |